• goodbadi

    Church Structure Opportunity

    Our small country church of 25-30 is in the process of deciding what sort of organization to be. This coming Sunday we’re hoping to settle on one of two possible structures, one involving a church leadership team of three plus two paid one-eighth-time pastors, and the other something M and I have been cooking up for a while. I’ll keep you posted about which model is chosen.

    Here’s the proposal M and I sent out this week:

    A small church like ours may be well-suited to guidance by lay leaders who share the workload with other members. Here is the makeup of a five-member Church Leadership Team as I envision could be very suitable for us considering our size and giftedness:
    1. Church leader: This person guides the CLT, calls leadership and congregational meetings, and is the “go-to person” who knows where to point people for help in their various needs. This person–or a willing designee–could be the liaison to the conference.
    2. Worship/teaching coordinator: This person provides focus to study themes/topics and coordinates worship schedules, enlisting the help of interested others.
    3. Facilities manager: This person coordinates building and grounds maintenance, enlisting the help of interested others.
    4. Secretary/treasurer: This person maintains church records and finances, enlisting the help of interested others (as needed).
    5. Congregational caregiver: This person coordinates the church’s responses to needs that arise, enlisting the help of interested others.

    Original term lengths could vary so that term end dates and subsequent terms are staggered.

    CLT members are NOT expected to do all the work in their area of expertise. Rather, while as church members they certainly are invited to chip in with the work, as CLT members they are primarily coordinators and responsible for delegating tasks to willing volunteers. (For example, if a person is hospitalized, the congregational caregiver might send out a request to everyone to provide visits, meals, etc. to the hospitalized person and family, establish a schedule for those willing to participate, and sign up him/herself to take a meal.)

    For meeting the occasional, larger need–such as a funeral or wedding–the CLT would need to meet together to plan and then pull in other members (or even outside support?) to help with the church’s response. Certainly this would require much of everyone involved (although many hands make light work).
    All of this said, a leadership structure like this–and a church our size–can support only so much large programming. Even with a 1/4-time pastor (or two 1/8-time pastors), our church is not/would not be equipped to provide large-scale operations (such as larger funeral services/weddings or large Bible school sessions like those that some churches offer) or be fully involved in all that our church district and conference have to offer. We just may have to accept and act creatively within our limitations.

    In general, there would need to be an understanding that if no one steps up to do a task, it may not get done–which may indicate that it’s not of utmost importance. We may also need to establish a relationship with our conference overseers that will enable their participation in our church’s times of particular need and allow us to help meet the conference’s needs to the degree we are able.

  • goodbadi

    Shameless Commerce: Review of the Cuisinart Smart Stick Hand Blender

    That we were provided with a free Cuisinart Smart Stick Hand Blender from CSN Stores doesn’t guarantee a succinct but flattering review of the item in question, but that’s what’s coming at you right this second.

    It’s a succinct tool, after all, and its slick maneuverability into hot soups and softened produce makes whipping up soups no longer a from-the-pot-to-the-blender-to-the-pot-again affair but a snappy zip-zap. Its powerful motor keeps things hopping, although the shielding of the blending blade gums up when it comes to boiled potatoes and cabbage.

    And I haven’t made a smoothie or milkshake with it yet (mainly because I’ve forgotten about them, recently), but don’t worry, it won’t be long before I will!

    Before actually going out and purchasing any goodbadi-reviewed item, please email goodbadiblog@gmail.com to confirm that the reviewed item’s features include longevity.

  • goodbadi

    N Today

    N, from the bathtub: Oh Dad! Come here! I peed in the cup! I want to show you the peed that I peeded!

    Downstairs, before supper:
    N: You are the daughter, and I am the mom.
    Me: Okay. Mom, you need to go wash your hands in the bathroom.
    N: Alright! [and then, a moment later] Daughter, I need help. I can’t reach the soap.
  • goodbadi

    Scarier Than Fiction

    Susan Hasler‘s perfectly titled Intelligence: A Novel of the CIA is one word: s-c-a-r-y. It also made me laugh, buried me in the sobriety of reality, horrified me, and kept me up late just to finish it. But it is, above all else, simply frightening. In fact, it’s so scary I really don’t think it’s a novel, except for maybe the last several chapters, in which–but I won’t tell you, because I highly recommend the book and don’t want to spoil it for you.

    More documentary/exposé than fiction, I think, Hasler’s work is a startling warning and, although the supposedly fictitious plot is laced with actual dates and real events, cannot be placed among the annals of historical fiction: its worries and action hearken back not to yesteryear but instead to yesterday, today, and tomorrow.

    The bureaucracy of and political maneuvering surrounding and within the CIA are the real culprits of this novel, and the frustration and cynicism felt by Hasler’s characters are infectious. Thankfully they (and therefore readers) find moments of relief from the stresses of their work, but the undercurrent of truth is hard to shelve: cumbersome agencies of “intelligence” are no match for destructive creativity.

  • goodbadi

    An Unprofound Thrillogy

    SPOILER ALERT…but since I don’t encourage the reading of the reviewed book, go ahead and be spoiled!

    The juvenile fiction The Hunger Games trilogy‘s attempt at sketching a “groundbreaking” story of political revolution into more than just an unprofound sequence of horrible, futuristic, seemingly video game-inspired events falls dreadfully short of anything but being intensely captivating.

    Katniss is an exasperating protagonist who thinks in sentence fragments and eventually comes to the realization that she’s not a very nice person. Furthermore, while all along she knows she is just a playing piece in the very apparent games of the harsh government, by the end of the third book she becomes aware that she’s also the pawn of rebel leaders.

    In the first book, Katniss volunteers to replace her little sister who has been randomly selected to play in “the Capitol’s” greatest annual display-of-power entertainment event in which two children from each of the twelve districts fight to the gruesome death in a highly controlled “arena” that frequently proves itself yet another enemy, all in accordance to the game makers’ whims.

    The trouble, she soon learns, is that her district’s other contestant, Peeta, happens to have always been madly in love with her. She struggles to please the games’ television audience–she knows that will bring in helps for winning–that is enthralled with their unfolding, violent love story that will necessarily, according to the rules of the game, leave but one victor. When all the other contestants bite the dust, however, Peeta and Katniss impulsively stand ready to kill themselves rather than each other. But if their poisonous berries are ingested, the Capitol will be left without a winner to celebrate, and so at the last second, the Capitol’s rule of one victor only is changed and both Katniss and Peeta are declared winners of the contest, to live forever in rare luxury, yes, but also, since they so forced the rule change–and on live TV, at that–as de facto enemies of the state.

    In the second book, Katniss and Peeta are summoned away from their comfortable lives in Victor Village for an extra round held in honor of an anniversary of the games, in which they again are to be enemies. By the end of the story Katniss learns that she is the symbol of the rebel uprising-to-be–and that the game’s other players know this and are determined to keep her alive at their own expense, in the name of the rebellion. In spite of her naive distrust of the other contestants, her blind need to survive, and her determination that Peeta will be the victor (she knows he is much more worthy of life than she), Katniss and events work together so that the rebels successfully bring down the arena and be swooped to the rebels’ territory.

    Finally, the third book details her participation in the revolution as occasional warrior and full-time mascot, her agonizing love for both Peeta and a childhood friend Gale, and finally her marriage.

    If my shortening summarizations of the consecutive books say nothing else, I hope they make apparent the diminishing philosophical returns of reading the trilogy. My initial imaginative hopes while reading the first book–that somehow Katniss and Peeta would avoid participating in the society’s violence and instead creatively undermine the evil government’s games through redemptive means–rather quickly eroded away to a sorrowful resignation that in spite of Katniss’s reluctance to kill her contestants, her heartfelt connections with others of them, her naming the games for what they are, her reckless protestation of the killing even and especially by the rebels, and her mental anguish spawned by the gut-wrenching violence and injustice that surrounds her and steals from her close friends and dear family, there is, apparently, no serious possibility in author Suzanne Collins’ worldview for overthrowing a dictator without killing off buttloads of people, and even the puresque Katniss’ ultimate motivation throughout the third book is getting to kill the evil president.

    Indeed, the plot not only wholly fails to avoid bloodshed, it also devolves into a list of absurd ways of killing people: Even though the rebel warriors are certainly vulnerable to everyday machine-gun fire (well, maybe except for Katniss, who has extravagant body armor), the booby traps on the streets range from waves of black gel, to spring-loaded nets webbed with piercing teeth, to streets that fold back and reveal pits filled with murderous beings.

    In short, although fun to have read, Collins’ thrill-inducing trilogy neglects to provide what textual video game lovers would never think to ask for: fundamentally novel political revolution.