• goodbadi

    Destruction of Property

    “The earth is the Lord’s and all that is in it,” reads Psalm 24. If that’s the case, and if God is at all like me, then “ticked off” might describe a godly reaction to the view from the highway near my house.

    In the midst of the purple mountain majesties, under cloud-swept skies, tower three pristine crosses. The middle one is taller, of course, and flanked by a duo of American flags that are just barely visible, from this vantage point. (Note the pictured traffic, too–a gasoline tanker, for crying out loud.)

    Certainly my church isn’t perfect (I wouldn’t deserve it if it were; I was practicing the consumption of fuel even as my outrage sparked along behind the tanker), but the responsible congregation’s ludicrous, ugly, and blasphemous projection of these synthetic, lit-up-at-night behemoths onto such serene mountainry commands only lament.

    What, in the name of all that is good, were they thinking?

  • goodbadi

    Names

    The sermon today was about names, about their meanings or indication of qualities desirable or learned. The speaker noted various Bible figures whose name changes signaled deeper life changes.

    To accompany the spoken word, the song leader chose a variety of “name” hymns. Two stuck out at me, one (“There’s a New Name Written Down in Glory”) that was a frequent favorite at the little church in the valley where as a youngster I lived briefly, and another that got it all sort of wrong.

    The latter hymn is called “Is My Name Written There.” Here below I’ve copied select lines, lines that gave me pause as we sang, from the text from a helpful website that even, um, plays the melody for the visitor.

    1. For me to sing “Lord, I care not for riches, neither silver nor gold” would be a flat-out lie. I’m loving the economic stimulus package (now tucked away in our savings account awaiting future material conquests).

    2. It is probably an equally false falsehood to sing that “Lord, my sins they are many, like the sands of the sea.” There is a l-o-t of sand in the sea, no doubt more grains than seconds in my life thus far or ever. (But could it be possible that I am actually sinning every second? Even twice every second? Even thrice every second? I don’t have that kind of energy!)

    3. Of course, too, the hymn is a blood song (“Thy blood, O my Savior, is sufficient for me”), propagation of a theology I find counter to the teachings of Jesus. But I’ll let that rest for the moment, as one yet-unpublished novel (which I’ve been lucky to read) deals thoroughly with that sort of schizoid understanding of The Loving God.

    4. Finally, while the song’s question in the first verses, “Tell me, Jesus, my Savior, is my name written there?” is, I think, a valid one for all of us concerned that we are living the kingdom, the song’s final verse requires its vocalists to commit the most egregious of sins–playing God: “Yes, my name’s written there.” Really? Can we just up and decide this? Is that really our decision to make? How judgmental!

    Perhaps at the base of this critical hymnology is a discomfort with theology far removed from Jesus’ teachings about life’s nuts and bolts, teachings relevant to so many of us nuts and dolts who perhaps need new names.

  • goodbadi

    Fuzzy Theology

    Some may remember, from my earlier posts, my colleague D. D is about to retire and is an outspoken member and critic of a Very Large Southern Denomination.

    A while back, on a teacher work day, D wandered into my classroom and said, “I’m reading a book by a guy with really fuzzy theology.”

    It turned out he was talking about Brian McLaren. “Oh,” I said. “I’m reading a book by him, too, one called A Generous Orthodoxy: Why I Am a Missional, Evangelical, Post/Protestant, Liberal/Conservative, Mystical/Poetic, Biblical, Charismatic/Contemplative, Fundamentalist/Calvinist, Anabaptist/Anglican, Methodist, Catholic, Green, Incarnational, Depressed-yet-Hopeful, Emergent, Unfinished CHRISTIAN, for my Sunday school class.”

    “Yep, I’ve read that one, too,” he said. (Actually, it sounded like he’d read most of McLaren’s books.) “And they haven’t thrown your class out of the church yet?” He quoted the bumper sticker motto of his denomination: “‘The Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it.’ Not much room for fuzziness there.”

    He talked more, about the dogmatism of his fellow Very Large Southern Denomination-ists, specifically a missions group concerned with feeding the poorest of the poor in Africa, who, in a spirit of grave concern, were tied up in knots because the miller who offered to grind for free the corn to be given away was, alas, not Christian. “Jesus didn’t say anything about that, did he?” D said. “No. He just said, ‘Feed the hungry.'”

    Several weeks later D popped in again. “Kicked out of church yet?”

    “No,” I said, chuckling. “But whenever we talk in Sunday school about what we don’t believe, we talk about your denomination.”

    “Aw, that’s OK,” he replied. “We’re so confident in our beliefs, that won’t hurt our feelings at all.”

  • goodbadi

    The Feminine Shaping of Jesus

    (Please note: Since I am no Bible scholar, this post may open a Pandora’s box of controversy and dis-accreditation, all at my expense.)

    It is said that behind every good man is a good woman. Behind Jesus, however, were quite a few good women.

    First, there’s the water-into-wine miracle in John 2, quoted here from oremus Bible Browser‘s New Revised Standard Version: On the third day there was a wedding in Cana of Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there. 2Jesus and his disciples had also been invited to the wedding. 3When the wine gave out, the mother of Jesus said to him, “They have no wine.” 4And Jesus said to her, “Woman, what concern is that to you and to me? My hour has not yet come.” 5His mother said to the servants, “Do whatever he tells you.” 6Now standing there were six stone water jars for the Jewish rites of purification, each holding twenty or thirty gallons. 7Jesus said to them, “Fill the jars with water.” And they filled them up to the brim. 8He said to them, “Now draw some out, and take it to the chief steward.” So they took it. 9When the steward tasted the water that had become wine, and did not know where it came from (though the servants who had drawn the water knew), the steward called the bridegroom 10and said to him, “Everyone serves the good wine first, and then the inferior wine after the guests have become drunk. But you have kept the good wine until now.” 11Jesus did this, the first of his signs, in Cana of Galilee, and revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him.

    Who effectively pushed Jesus into his active Godliness? His mother, a woman.

    And then there’s the challenge in John 4: 5So he came to a Samaritan city called Sychar, near the plot of ground that Jacob had given to his son Joseph. 6Jacob’s well was there, and Jesus, tired out by his journey, was sitting by the well. It was about noon. 7A Samaritan woman came to draw water, and Jesus said to her, “Give me a drink.” 8(His disciples had gone to the city to buy food.) 9The Samaritan woman said to him, “How is it that you, a Jew, ask a drink of me, a woman of Samaria?” (Jews do not share things in common with Samaritans.) 10Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is that is saying to you, ‘Give me a drink,’ you would have asked him, and he would have given you living water.”

    Jesus begins by acting like a male in a male-dominated society–he demands a drink. The woman is no back-bender-over, though, and she challenges his assuming request, which leads to Jesus’ verbal clarification of his own purpose, to give “living water” to everyone.

    A more blatantly stark point on Jesus’ learning curve appears in Mark 7, where 25…a woman whose little daughter had an unclean spirit immediately heard about him, and she came and bowed down at his feet. 26Now the woman was a Gentile, of Syrophoenician origin. She begged him to cast the demon out of her daughter. 27He said to her, “Let the children be fed first, for it is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.” 28But she answered him, “Sir, even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.” 29Then he said to her, “For saying that, you may go—the demon has left your daughter.” 30So she went home, found the child lying on the bed, and the demon gone.

    The Syrophoenician woman insisted that Jesus share his love beyond his own personal boundaries. Lucky for so many of us, he listened.

    And finally, there’s the whole raising-Lazarus-from-the-dead incident, in which Martha puts things into her own terms, in John 11: 17When Jesus arrived, he found that Lazarus had already been in the tomb four days. 18Now Bethany was near Jerusalem, some two miles away, 19and many of the Jews had come to Martha and Mary to console them about their brother. 20When Martha heard that Jesus was coming, she went and met him, while Mary stayed at home. 21Martha said to Jesus, “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died. 22But even now I know that God will give you whatever you ask of him.” 23Jesus said to her, “Your brother will rise again.” 24Martha said to him, “I know that he will rise again in the resurrection on the last day.” 25Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. Those who believe in me, even though they die, will live, 26and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?” 27She said to him, “Yes, Lord, I believe that you are the Messiah, the Son of God, the one coming into the world.” 28When she had said this, she went back and called her sister Mary, and told her privately, “The Teacher is here and is calling for you.” 29And when she heard it, she got up quickly and went to him. 30Now Jesus had not yet come to the village, but was still at the place where Martha had met him. 31The Jews who were with her in the house, consoling her, saw Mary get up quickly and go out. They followed her because they thought that she was going to the tomb to weep there. 32When Mary came where Jesus was and saw him, she knelt at his feet and said to him, “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died.”

    Martha does more than Jesus bids: she basically tells him it’s his fault Lazarus has died, and she tells him to use his God connection to perform a miracle. A bit later, when Jesus asks her for a statement of faith, she does not answer his question but, instead, states her own perspective. Still later, Martha tells Mary that Jesus was calling her–which may not be true, since it’s not in the text. Why would Martha want Mary present? Perhaps to lay on guilt trip pressure for a miracle, which Mary does obligingly, and Jesus ends up raising Lazarus from the dead.

    Even God’s got to admit that women rock!

  • goodbadi

    Faith

    I have a student with the name “Faith.” As is customary, prior to my team’s meeting with her parents to work out a plan for her scholastic achievement, I emailed the entire school staff to invite other comments. As I had just emailed about another student’s parent conference, I wrote in the email subject line, “Faith, too.” I received one reply, from my colleague D, who wrote, “I have that, too.” My response was brief: “And hope, and love?”

    Faith. It takes many forms.

    The middle school students I saw this week on morning bus duty had faith, faith that made the last school bus step not a step only but a platform from which to leap into the new day.

    In a classroom game of “form words using index cards with random base words and affixes,” I watched as members of both the boy and girl teams, full of faith that the last minutes of playing time would determine their personal success, jumped up and down excitedly while awaiting their turn to add a word to the list.

    Not to be outdone by my students, I, too, have faith. On my school-wide announcement about a special activity for a group of select students, I wrote, “Prize options will include an outdated Napoleon Dynamite calendar, and piece of Styrofoam, and much more,” in faith that eccentricity will beat out practicality any twelve-year-old’s day.

    And it did. The colleague who assisted with the activity, when I initially told her about the prizes, seemed unimpressed by my selection of trinkets and otherwise useless objects. “I’ll bring some prizes, too,” she said, and she did–really good candy bars, one of which I pilfered to give to my dear wife.

    In the introduction to the activity–the students were to map out a road trip and could earn points for each city, state, national park, etc.–I told the contestants about the prizes.

    “First, we have these candy bars,” I said. I could just sense the students’ ears perking up.

    Then, holding up the objects, I said, “And we also have an outdated Napoleon Dynamite calendar, a piece of Styrofoam–” but was interrupted by at least two students calling out, “Oooh, I want that!” My colleague was floored.

    At the end of the contest, the winners who chose candy seemed pleased, but not as excited as the boy who chose the Napoleon Dynamite calendar (“I’m going to give it to my dad,” he said), or the girl who chose the Styrofoam (“Yes!”), or even the boy who picked out a rock with some fossil impressions in it.

    “What am I going to do with a rock?” he asked.

  • goodbadi

    Simply Christian

    In his text Simply Christian: Why Christianity Makes Sense, N.T. Wright attempts to weave all of biblical history and the development of Christianity into a supposedly simple, watertight TV-dinner package. The book, which we’re currently studying in Sunday school, doesn’t really work for me, perhaps because it’s a rather complex attempt to tie so much together into one knot.
    Some things Wright says are, I would venture to guess, on target. For example, he asserts that the universal human longings for justice, spirituality, beauty, and relationship all point to the presence of a bigger, as-yet-unrealized reality that is God’s kingdom. However, he limits the entirety of the human experience to any of three options for understanding God’s association with the world: God is an entity entirely separate from earthly reality, God is in everything (and yes, that table over there is God), or God’s realm intersects with the earthly realm in Jesus (God’s “rescue operation”) and his followers.

    I wonder if there couldn’t be a fourth option for understanding our interaction with the divine. Here it is–a succinctly summarized, universal, non-heady, truly simple platform on which Christians can be living contributors to the kingdom of God here on Earth: God is love, Jesus embodied that love, the spirit of God resides where there is love, and the ultimate ethic and morality is to act in love, a love that includes the offering–and inevitable receiving–of grace and forgiveness. One of my university Bible professors asked this question, which I think helps us muddle through how this fourth option is to be played out: “Is ______ life giving or death dealing?”

    (By the way, this was the same professor who assigned readings by Walter Brueggemann, whose comment on the back cover of Wright’s book reads, “Readers will welcome such ready access to one of the fine teachers of the church.”)

    I say that this fourth option is “simply Christian” not because it’s easy, but because it lays to rest many oft-debated, bogging-down theological and doctrinal points such as biblical infallibility, the virgin birth, the afterlife, the existence of miracles, the meaning of the crucifixion, etc., and instead challenges each and every person to immediately practical godliness.